German
French
Italian
Portuguese
Japanese
Korrean
Russian
Which disposable integrated air filter has a longer service life than a conventional filter?
Which disposable integrated air filter has a longer service life than a conventional filter?The service life comparison between the disposable integrated air filter and the traditional filter needs to be comprehensively analyzed according to the specific type, maintenance mode, and use scenario. The following are the key comparison points:1. Service life difference Disposable filter The replacement cycle is clear: Initial onset (G3-G4) : 3-6 months Intermediate (F7-F9): 6-12 months High efficiency (H13-H14): 1-2 years Ultra High Performance (U15-U17): 2-3 years The life depends on the filtration efficiency level: the higher the level (such as H14 than H13), the greater the dust capacity, and the longer the life. Advantages: Sealed structure to avoid leakage, dust capacity than the traditional plate filter 20%-30% higher (such as H13 dust capacity up to 800-1200g). Conventional filter Washable filters (such as household sponge filters) : Theoretical life: 1-3 years (monthly cleaning required). Actual life: Frequent cleaning is easy to lead to filter fiber breakage, filtration efficiency is reduced by 15%-20% per year and may need to be replaced in advance. Replaceable filter (such as household purifier HEPA filter) : Life: 6-12 months (depending on the frequency of use, and environmental dust concentration). Multi-layer combined system (such as industrial initial effect + medium effect + high efficiency) : Life stratification: the initial effect is 3-6 months, the middle effect is 6-12 months, and the high efficiency is 1-2 years, which needs to be replaced layer by layer and the maintenance is complex. Second, long-term performance comparison Dimensional disposable filters Traditional filters Maintenance impact No cleaning loss, stable performance until reduced efficiency after replacement cycle cleaning (e.g. washable filter efficiency reduced from 90% to 75%) High dust capacity (H13 class is about 30% higher than traditional plate) Low (small filter area of plate structure) Seal reliability Closed design, no leakage risk may be due to improper installation or aging caused by air leakage End-of-life resistance exceeds the standard or cleanliness is not up to standard efficiency reduction or physical damage (such as filter damage) 3. Economy in typical scenarios Home/Office (Medium Filter) Discard type (F7-F9): The annual replacement cost is about 200-500 yuan, and the life is stable for 1 year. Traditional washable filter: the initial cost is low (50-100 yuan), but it needs frequent cleaning, improper maintenance may lead to reduced efficiency, and the actual life may be only 1-2 years. Medical/Industrial (High Efficiency Filtration) Discard type (H13): The annual replacement cost is about 1000-2000 yuan, and the life is strictly replaced by resistance or time. Traditional high-efficiency filters: need regular leak detection, and cleaning, high maintenance costs, and life may be shortened to less than 1 year due to maintenance is not timely. Conclusion: Who lives longer? Short-term use: Traditional washable filters may have a longer initial life (such as when not cleaned) but are expensive to maintain. The disposable type is replaced periodically with stable performance. Long-term use: The overall life of the disposable type is better (depending on regular replacement), especially in highly polluted environments. Traditional filters, if properly maintained (such as the strict periodic replacement of the filter element in industrial systems), can be close to disposable life, but the maintenance complexity is high. Recommended scenario: Select discard: medical, industrial, commercial buildings, and other scenes with high cleanliness requirements, or users pursue convenience. Choose traditional: low pollution in the home environment, and users can accept frequent maintenance. |
